Reaction: Automotive industry associations comment on careless driver crackdown

Wednesday, June 5, 2013 - 15:20
Comments off

HOGS: Fixed penalty will now be the punishment

Associations across the automotive industry have responded to today’s news that police are to issue fixed penalty tickets to careless drivers.

Stephen Hammond MP, Road Safety Minister, announced from next month tailgaters, lane-hoggers and mobile phone users will face stricter punishment.

It was also announced that fixed penalty notices will rise – most offences will now cost lawbreakers £100, while driving without insurance will incur a £300 fine.

Here are the reactions of several key automotive industry bodies:


Julie Townsend, Deputy Chief Executive:

“We welcome the introduction of on-the-spot fines for careless driving, to make it easier for police to catch and prosecute risky law-breaking drivers.

“We are also pleased to see a much-needed rise in driving offence fines, but think this doesn’t go far enough.

“It’s crucial we encourage greater respect for laws on our roads, which are in place to protect people’s lives, and higher fines can help achieve this.

“£100 is not enough to pose a strong deterrent to potentially life-threatening behaviour, like using a mobile at the wheel.

“We are also calling on government to stem worrying cut-backs in traffic policing levels.

“We believe traffic policing should be made a national policing priority, to ensure we have sufficient numbers of officers enforcing vital safety laws on our roads.”

British Insurance Brokers’ Association (BIBA)

Graeme Trudgill, Executive Director:

“BIBA has long called for tougher penalties for uninsured drivers and we welcome the Government’s commitment to increase the fine for this offence.

“We recently discussed increasing the sanctions for those caught driving without insurance with Stephen Hammond and we’re pleased that he has announced a tougher stance which should act as a deterrent.

“Uninsured driving is a scourge on our roads, costing honest motorists around £30 per policy.

“Uninsured drivers are also five times more likely to be involved in road collisions, fail to comply with traffic laws, or be engaged in other criminal activity.”

Freight Transport Association (FTA)

Malcolm Bingham, Head of Policy for Roads:

“The review of fixed penalty levels was long overdue and we believe that the new levels will better reflect the severity of the offences covered.

“It is important that fines provide a real deterrent to illegal behaviour and encourage greater compliance with road safety laws which are in place to ensure the wellbeing of all road users.

“While calculating inflation over a 12 to 15-year period is a mathematical issue it becomes difficult to convince the public the large increases are in line with inflation.

“We therefore would support a better system of review of penalties, say on a 2 yearly basis.”

Institute for Advanced Motorists (IAM)

Neil Greig, Director of Policy and Research:

“This is a major change in traffic law enforcement and the IAM is concerned that issuing fixed penalty tickets for careless driving downplays the seriousness of the offence.

“Careless covers a wide range of poor to reckless driving behaviour that often merits further investigation.

“This could free up traffic police time and allow them to maintain a higher profile.

“But without traffic cops out on the road to enforce this new approach it will have little impact on road safety.”

Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA)

Kevin Clinton, Head of Road Safety:

“We supported the proposals in last year’s consultation because we believe that they will make it easier for the police to enforce careless driving laws, and so discourage such driving.

“However, there is a certain amount of subjectivity in deciding what constitutes ‘careless driving’ and what is sufficiently minor and suitable for a fixed penalty and what is more serious, meriting prosecution in court.

“There must be as much consistency as possible in the use of this new power.

“Therefore, we hope to see a clear definition of the sorts of ‘careless driving’ that may result in a fixed penalty notice and the reasons why, publicised widely.

“Training for police officers in the use of this new power, and a robust monitoring system, will be needed to ensure consistency in the application of fixed penalties for careless driving.

“RoSPA strongly supports the use of remedial driver training as an alternative to the fixed penalty notice.

“It is better to seek to change offenders’ behaviour and help them to improve their driving or riding so they are less likely to re-offend.

“The increase in fines will boost the deterrent effect of the fixed penalty notices, and make paying to take the alternative option (when offered) of a remedial driver training course a more attractive option than simply paying the fine.

“This would provide an opportunity to help offending drivers to improve their driving and avoid repeating their offending.

“This would help to reduce road casualties.”

Image courtesy of Highways Agency, with thanks.


  1. I also think the hogging of lane two and three needs to be clarified.
    Lane hogging at under 70mph is really selfish and needs punishing.
    If you are doing 70mph in either of these lanes you maybe overtaking vehicles doing 67mph for instance and that would obviously take quite a distance to pass. Also if you are doing 70mph in these circumstances, you would certainly get tailgaters trying to push you along and all to often it’s a van. I am passed regularly by vans doing well over the speed limit and they appear to be main culprits of tailgating, lane hogging and speeding. It seems many people do not like being overtaken by vans so they increase their speed to keep up. However vans are not the only culprits by any stretch of the imagination. How often do we see large lorries travelling for miles side by side on the motorway. This causes everything else to use lane three. I for one would like to see the motorway speed limit raised to 80mph for cars especially on long quiet stretches. It should also be reduced to 55/60mph in busy area’s or at peak times..

  2. Why not increase the fines to more the cost to have a training day. this way more drivers may take the training days. as I’m a professional driver I see bad driving all the time. I also am in charge of 9 drivers that have regular training day. and have seen the improvement in the reduction in fuel use and less damage to the fleet of vehicles

  3. I often drive the motorways and obey the limits especially when towing a caravan , As I am not allowed to overtake via the outside lane I am often forced to reduce speed and cruise in the middle lane because of someone who will not move over into the inside lane , this causes other users to get frustrated behind me and blame caravans for the hold up as they cannot see the car /van in front of me doing 50. This frustration make other m/way users to carry out erratic acts like undertaking . I have experience some stupid people who will do anything to get in front of me like leaving it late to take the exit – missed me by 3 inches with me having to brake heavily ,he put me and my families life at risk

  4. Regarding the use of hand held mobile phones I see many professional drivers every day using their phones some even texting,if driving is your profession and you leave home without a hands free device then £100 fine plus 3 points is not enough it should carry an automatic ban especially if you are in charge of a heavy vehicle or passengers.

  5. Undertaking with the view to cut infront of any vehicle should be a dangerous driving offence and not deemed careless driving under any circumstances.The hogging of lanes two and three should be clarified ie;would traveling at 70mph constitute hogging when slower vehicles are ahead in the nearside lanes I often travel for several miles in either lane two or three to clear slow vehicles.I also think that the most dangerous time on motorways is in the morning and evening rush hours near cities maybe there should be a new rule that sections approaching major intersections carry a 50mph limit during rush hours.

  6. I quite naturally assume that the revenue raised from this will be put straight back into a fund to replace/repair the disgraceful dirt tracks that pass as roads in most parts of our green and pleasant…..NOT!

  7. Whilst agreeing with all that has been said I am surprised that there has been no mention of the incresingly dangerous practise of motorists overtaking on the left (undertaking)on motorways. I seem to witness this manouvre more and more and its potentially more dangerous that tailgating as far as I’m concerned as you don’t always see the offending driver until he/she is overtaking.

Advertise here