‘Stop abusing speed trap rules’, ABD urge police
By Kyle Linsay
Friday, October 18, 2013 - 09:00
GUIDE: ACFO reveal police speeding position
New ‘sensible’ Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) speeding guidelines must not be ignored by local bodies, the Association of British Drivers (ABD) have insisted.
Local police chiefs and councils have been guilty in the past of liberal enforcement of speeding laws, the ABD claim, but with the new guidelines things must change.
The guidelines contain the following key statements on the police position on all speed limits:
- “Where limits are not clear (that is they don’t feel/look like the limit or are on inappropriate roads), they will not be routinely enforced”
- “Unclear or even confusing limits (all limits, not just 20s) will undoubtedly lead to mistaken offending and any aggressive enforcement risks a loss of public support for the action and more importantly the police service”
- “The desired outcome has to be speeds at the limit chosen so as to achieve safe roads for other and vulnerable users not high speeds and high enforcement”
- “Speeding problems identified in an area must have the engineering, site clarity and need re-assessed, not simply a call for more enforcement”
- “Enforcing against drivers who simply misread the road may not be appropriate”
The guidelines also reiterate the current recommendation of enforcement levels at a 10%+2mph threshold above the limit.
Nigel Humphries, ABD spokesman, said: “In general the attitude of ACPO is commendable.
“The gist of these guidelines is that limits should suit the road and that police should use their discretion to enforce only where the limit is obvious to drivers and would be what they would expect from what they can see through the windscreen.
“Limits should not be set well below what drivers would expect to see and then be enforced to achieve high rates of offender punishment.
“Unfortunately many local authorities and police chiefs appear not to understand this simple concept, believing that just sticking up a sign and prosecuting thousands of safe drivers somehow improves safety.
“It does not, but it does of course make a lot of money for those selling enforcement equipment and training courses.
“Whilst the enforcement guidelines are generally sensible, we are disappointed to see ACPO adopting the contradictory approach to their own advice by supporting setting of speed limits at the average speed of traffic.
“If they want appropriate speed limits without excessive prosecution of safe drivers then the answer is clearly to reintroduce setting of limits at the 85th percentile.
“Setting limits at the average speed inevitably results in the unjust criminalisation of the speed that a large proportion of drivers assume to be correct for what they see through their windscreen.
“It is a fundamentally wrong approach.”
Image courtesy of brizzle born and bred, with thanks.