HGV test changes need caps on training charges

Planned changes to lorry tests to address HGV driver shortages require caps on driver training charges, and the introduction of mandatory mentoring schemes to properly solve shortages, according to Advanced Supply Chain Group (ASCG).

The global logistics company, which operates a fleet or more than 50 articulated lorries, is calling for more considered measures ahead of Government-led changes being introduced on 15 November 2021. ASCG also believes reducing the length of driver tests is not the most-effective answer for getting more HGV drivers on UK roads.

Under current rules, a Class 1 HGV driver (category CE) must first learn to drive and pass a driving test for smaller Class 2 vehicles (category C). New changes from 15 November will end this process, with provisional lorry licence holders able to go straight to Class 1 testing.

Scott Barry, Operations Director at ASCG, said: “Scrapping the requirement for Class 2 training and testing also scraps a valuable revenue scheme for training providers. Each driver will spend around £2,500 to obtain a Class 2 licence and then a similar amount again as they aim to upgrade to Class 1.

“Forthcoming lorry test changes mean that HGV training providers could see half their income disappear overnight, as drivers no longer have to spend on the Class 2 stage. These companies will need to recoup losses and it’s plausible they’ll do this by hiking up the costs of Class 1 training.

“Escalating costs of Class 1 would render test changes useless, as new drivers would be priced out of getting their licences. Serious thought needs to be given to placing a cap on training charges to ensure licences remain affordable for drivers and businesses.”

Lorry testing changes will mean that provisional licence holders can take their large articulated lorry test without having to pass a test first in a large rigid lorry. This also follows other Class 1 test changes, where reversing and ‘uncoupling and recoupling’ exercises are removed from tests to make them shorter and free up more time to test more drivers.

“We’re going to have many more scenarios where a lot of new, provisional drivers are going from driving cars and vans to vehicles about 10 times the size of what they’re used to, added Scott Barry. “This is a big leap and, despite training and testing, can make the first few months of HGV driving nervy, uncomfortable and stressful for them.

“These circumstances risk causing a high dropout rate of new drivers. A buddy-type mentor scheme, where new drivers spend their first few weeks shadowing experienced drivers would build their confidence. They’d be able to tackle tricky manoeuvres like reversing with guidance and it’d help address any dangers created by shorter, potentially less thorough tests.”

Tests are being shortened to fast-track new drivers into the industry, with Government believing up to 50,000 more tests could be made available per year. ASCG believes a more effective route to achieving this would be to focus on pre-test steps to build driver confidence.

Scott Barry concludes: “In some areas, there’s around a 40% failure rate for first-time drivers taking Class 1 tests. More often than not, this is due to nerves. If the level of failures can be reduced, it would free up a considerable amount of resource to do more testing.

“Pre-test, more time could be allowed for new drivers to familiarise themselves with vehicles and run through what they’ve learnt. This could involve learners driving around a private area with no public roads to help settle nerves and wouldn’t necessarily require additional time from approved testers.

“If changes to HGV testing are to solve problems of driver shortages, they need to be much more considerate of building confidence in new drivers. Potentially shortcutting training and testing will not achieve this and risks creating driver churn that could make it more challenging for the industry to recruit and retain talent.”

1 Comments

  1. I am disappointed that despite the current difficulties employing drivers, the companies seem t abdicate from responsibility. The reasons are so obvious. HGV drivers have been treated with contempt at points of loading and unloading. Facilities for services and breaks are in the main, dirty, expensive to eat and park, and insufficient coverage.

    For HGV and PSV the employers, by using cheap, mainly East European labour, have cut wages to subsistence levels, meaning that being responsible for a high value cargo or up to 120 passengers, pays no more than stacking shelves. No matter what training or jiggling of the CPC etc, untill the employers mindset changes, they will not retain good staff.

    In the last 15 years or so driving large vehicles, I heard more than once the vernacular for if you don’t like it go away. The worms have turned.