Motorists Disagree With The Drink Driving Strategy

Friday, December 15, 2017 - 15:30
Comments off

AlcoSense Pro Xmas shot

Nearly two thirds of motorists (63%) don’t agree with the Government’s strategy to tackle drink driving, new research has found.

Despite calls from experts to lower the English/Welsh drink- drive limit, the Government believes better enforcement of the current limit – as opposed to lowering the limit itself – is the best way to improve road safety.

But in a survey of 2,000 drivers by AlcoSense Breathalysers, 43% of respondents felt the best way to deal with the problem was to both lower the limit and to step up enforcement.

A further 20% felt the best course of action was to lower the limit even if enforcement remains the same. Less than a third (27%) think that the Government’s strategy of better Police enforcement on its own would be the best way to tackle drink driving.

Having reaped the rewards of a reduced drink drive limit in Scotland, 85% of the Scots polled believe England and Wales should also reduce their limit.

Despite years of Christmas drink-drive advertising campaigns it seems the message still isn’t getting through to some drivers, according to the research.

A quarter (26%) of motorists admitted that they think they would drive after a few drinks with friends and family this Christmas, knowing they had alcohol in their system, if they felt sure they were under the limit.

13% said they think they would get behind the wheel even if they thought they might be close to the limit but ‘just about OK’.

And a worrying 5% of those surveyed would drive after Christmas drinks even though they thought they were at the limit or just over.

Feeling ‘sober enough’ was a reason given by 43%, whilst 38% thought they would ‘probably get away with it’ and 37% justified it by only having ‘a short distance to drive’.

The ‘morning after’ effect is also widely misunderstood, according to the AlcoSense research.

Asked whether they would drive at 7am after a Christmas party the previous evening, where they’d probably been over the drink-drive limit, a quarter of motorists said they would – with women (26%) more likely to chance it than men (23%).

That figure rose to an alarming 45% amongst younger drivers (aged 18-24) who said they would drive despite possibly having residual alcohol in their system.

Nearly a fifth of drink drive convictions are the morning after the night before, and a third of all breath tests after an accident are conducted between 7am and 1pm.

When given some data on the likelihood of being involved in a fatal accident, two thirds of the drivers polled (67%) said the English/Welsh limit should be reduced to 50mg or lower, with nearly a quarter (24%) saying it should be zero. Just 18% said it should remain at the current level.

“The Government says better enforcement of the law is the answer, yet the number of road policing officers has fallen by 27% since 2011”, comments Hunter Abbott, Managing Director of AlcoSense Laboratories and an Advisor to the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety.

“It’s clear from our survey of regular drivers who drink alcohol at least once a week that they want to see the limit reduced as well.

“Even one alcoholic drink can slow your reaction time, inhibit judgement, reduce concentration and affect motor skills such as eye, foot and hand co-ordination – increasing the likelihood of an accident”.


Comments are closed.